Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
Year 3 Residency Day 2 – Implementing Scholarly Thinking
We gave our presentation today and had a lot of fun doing it. Afterwards our instructor gave us our feedback – told us what we did well, where we screwed up (which we did really really well), and how to fix it going forward. We have all been trying to get into a scholarly thinking mode for the process of writing our dissertations. However, one of the things that we learned from this exercise is that we need to apply scholarly thinking to EVERYTHING.
Scholarly thinking requires inquiry in an in-depth manner without bias and preconceptions. One must open their mind to the possibilities and not make assumptions based on surface information. Scholars look for:
- The underlying theory of what they are reading
- A model and a plan for moving forward including a possible solution
- A way to evaluate the model or plan and make changes where necessary
My group had a model and the beginnings of a plan to move forward, but was not in-depth enough for what our instructor was looking for. However, when she was giving us our feedback, our instructor pointed out that she had not given us the assignment rubrics on purpose in order to evaluate where our thinking was and expected us to perform as we had. Now she expects us to improve. Now we get to find out what’s next…
Do You Understand Atheism (Even if You Don’t Agree with It)?
Many theists (people who believe in a god or gods) don’t understand how atheists (people who don’t believe in a god or gods) can believe the way they do and also believe in a spirit or spirituality. Theists also don’t seem to understand how atheists can believe that this life is all there is. Stephen Fry explains these beliefs in a simple, yet eloquent way.
Your thoughts on this? Please share…
Social Networking in Medicine…Good Idea? Bad Idea?
It has been another interesting and enlightening week for me. My dissertation project seems to constantly occupy a significant portion of my brain (awake or asleep) even while I am doing unrelated activities. I seem to be finding examples of how Web 2.0 (another name for social networking) is impacting my work and life in general. I’m also finding areas where I wish it would have a bigger impact.
For example, since I had my medical incident in December of last year, I find that I have information I want to communicate to 4 different physicians. Three of those physicians are on an electronic health record so, in theory, if I can tell one, two of the others should know about it as well if I find a way to ask them to look. I may have just come across a way to do that using a new patient messaging system. I can leave a message for specific physicians (I think). However, they cannot answer in kind. I would need to go see them or request a return phone call. I know there are patient privacy issues (HIPAA) involved, but having to print out things and physically deliver this information in order to inform them when an email would suffice seems highly inefficient and unproductive. Especially when my employer (a large healthcare network) is also a) three of my physicians’ employer and b) my insurance provider. Something that should take five minutes for me to send and another five minutes for each physician to read instead takes four man-hours to communicate because I have to visit each of the three physicians for a consultation. The fourth physician is an independent physician and pretty much out of the loop anyway. He’s a whole different kettle of fish and about to lose my business for other reasons…
What are your thoughts about using social networking technologies – or even just email – in a medical setting as communication between patients and physicians? Please share!
Image Credit: This T-Shirt is a product offered on Zazzle. I plan to purchase one for myself (because I think it’s cute), but am not (at this point) endorsing this product or Zazzle in any way.
Lessons from this week…
This week I learned an important lesson about thinking too big and making things too complicated. I was concerned about doing a valid study and really made the process more complicated than it needed to be. Today I watched a TED Talk given by Rachel Pike (2009), a graduate student in environmental science. During her talk she mentioned that her study was on one type of molecule that is found in the atmosphere and is affected by climate change. Between listening to this talk and talking on the phone with Dr. Holley, I was able to really simplify things and bring my study (and my head) down to size.
A doctoral dissertation is not the solution to some grand problem. It is a study of a problem that will contribute to the body of knowledge around that problem. It’s taking one little piece of the problem and examining it closely and reporting on it. The dissertation project becomes much less overwhelming and tiresome when the student keeps that in mind.
References: Pike, R. (2009). Rachel Pike: The science behind a climate headline. New York, NY: TED Conferences, LLC. Retrieved on February 15, 2010 from http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/rachel_pike_the_science_behind_a_climate_headline.html.
Image Credit: Image was retrieved on February 15, 2010 from Ph.D. Comics.
Liz Coleman’s call to reinvent liberal arts education
This is a powerful speech about the need for reform in education and the embrace of higher education by the masses.
More information about Liz Coleman can be found on the TED Site.